Month: June 2014
June 28th, 2014
After recently viewing the youtube “Destruction of the Papal Key” and experiencing the illusional reality of our precious Sun bee-ing manipulated I was informed of these inner truths. Simultaneously, I had been experiencing an intensifying of energies over the past few days whole soul searching for a kernel of truth of their essence and purpose. This was not necessarily a comfortable energy yet I wasn’t bee-ing able to come to peace with it.
This morning I was determined to sit until I experienceed a deep frequency of calm and quietude. This is when my inner truths revealed and reminded me of the programs that use “noise” as a deterrent and non-peaceful strategy of outer control. Upon this awareness I was able to recognize that my past few days were filled with “noise”. This “noise” was interfering with my deep inner calm. As all-ways, upon awareness, my calm started to emerge. Slowly but surely, my inner vision regained clarity and I was in communication with my multidimensional selves. This is when I turned my focus to the data from “Destruction of the Papal Key”. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbsjeVoJe6s)
I praise and adore Atam Ra, our precious Sun, as an integral part of my bee-ingness. In fact, each day I greet Atam Ra as my lover and say thank you for bee-ing there to greet me. With the recent data download via youtube I viewed our Sun with inquiry and invitation to provide myself with more data about the circumstances and activity surrounding this glowing, fiery light. I revealed to myself that “noise” was, in fact, one of the instruments bee-ing used to manipulate the once benevolent intention of the keys. I was prompted to deepen my frequency of quietude to surround the situation with an absence of “noise”. The surrounding Galactic Family praised my “doing” and the “noisemakers” began to fall away from the Sun. Quietude dis-armed the program and enthused the benevolent intention of the Sun to full force. It then disengaged from the programmed scenario and started to move. Simultaneously, the Earth started to spin and move as well. Destination appeared to be the Center of The Unviverse.
Video Posted on Updated on
June 18th, 2014
Nugget of OPC
I was prompted to come to Morocco and join with the One People’s “Community” , a word that is under continual reassessment and definition, because of a consciousness shared via the many online radio shows. As I entered this world of hope, dreams and imaginings a pandora’s box awaited each and every individual. How one related to this box was the variety of perspectives to be revealed.
Upon arrival in Aouchtam, Morocco, it was only 1 week before the QEG Project was to be launched. As a result 60-70 people were due to arrive. Very shortly before this event Wayne, Lisa and Whitney had boldly signed their names to a 1 year lease of what is presently referred to as The Sanctuary, Consciousness Clubhouse and The Compound. Alongside this bold action Brian and Jorge had signed a 1 year lease to what is commonly referred to as the Front or Seaside Apartments. There was preparation for the many that would need housing, cooking ware, blankets, towels, etc.
As a result of the QEG on the heels of The Sanctuary bee-ing embraced the core group, Lisa, Brian, Bob and Whitney, directed their attention to the needs of the upcoming event and the original vision of The Sanctuary was put on a back burner. Although this event was indeed part of the vision it was a bit sooner than the core had time to really cement their vision and plan of unfoldment.
The QEG Event started with a “pow”, exhilarating, hopeful and all the good things and magic of a group converging with a shared celebratory focus. We created a festival of sorts and organized our needs as they occurred with the core group truly holding the brunt of things falling through the cracks or last minute calls for toilet paper and such…seriously!
If you stepped back for a moment the core was weaving the threads 24/7 propelled by the excitement and love of everyone. Inevitably all could not be surveyed or addressed in regard to the use of The Sanctuary as the focus was clearly hosting the people and the QEG event…understandably so.
Well, as all festivals go an end was in site and clean-up was evident and core was tired but the demands continued.
It appeared as if The Sanctuary had gone the direction of anarchy, in a good way, but what about the old paradigm or the transitioning bridge of answering to who and how do we pay the rent come the first of the month? And if decisions were bee-ing made in an anarchist sort of direction who is liable to the consequences of the decisions of the group?! Hey, who is responsible here when the needs of The Sanctuary aren’t bee-ing addressed?! Hmmmm….down the rabbit hole we went. A kernel of truth emerged. There were indeed 3 bee-ings answerable to the consequences of individual’s actions when in regard to The Sanctuary. That would be the 3 names on the lease. So now what happened?
It was clear the core group now needed that very valuable time to clarify their vision and how they wanted to implement the fulfillment of their imagineering. As a result a clearing of the space was needed and thus a request was made to do just that. This presented many ripples of reactions and responses and thus the veils of the life we had all just ejected ourselves from, as in the 3D paradigm, came tumbling down upon us. Dreams, expectations, fear all sat their butts down at each and everyone’s feet. This is when the real work at hand started.
Yes, there was confusion and the old separative ways emerged…feelings got hurt, misunderstandings occurred, stalemates resulted, group processing was attempted, disappointment, despair and on and on. There was nothing different under the sun when it came to creating “community” and very skimpily we found some nuggets of vision here and there but hardly enough to float us above the chaos.
This was the call for what I named “the OPC Perspective”. Where did all that uplifting consciousness that we had shared online for over a year go? Why did this happen to us? I thought we were above that! Hmmmm, now what?!
At this point I’d like to share a little bit about myself. I have experienced a multitude of what we have called “intentional communities”. When asked what wisdom would I bring to this “now” moment of yet another “community (?)” …and please note question mark after the word community…my response is “nothing”.
When I heard the inner call to join with the One People in Morocco I already knew it was not going to be yet another hopeful dream or desire to create “community”. I was not naive about the potential obstacles that would be awaiting my arrival. And so, there were no expectations in that regard. However, there was what I call a “Nugget” that I was bee-ing attracted to…and that was an element of “consciousness”. This nugget had no form or structure or intentional anything yet it had a “pointer” of brilliance. That is what I want to share with others.
Connectivity, however you may experience that for yourself, is the seed that sprouts from inner stillness. All the answers lie within. You have heard this message in a myriad of forms but the essential tool is practice.
When the nugget of the One People sparked in me it was the only piece that I had not experienced with others up to this point of my existence on earth. How refreshing that something new and different was occurring. I wanted to join my energies and nurturance with this sprouting seed.
The OPC Perspective is the only potential seed that I see as worthy of cultivation and study. The gem that I receive from this perspective is total inner existence. The pointers are self responsibility, self reflection, transparency, inner bee-ing…the I Am, eternal essence.
And, this, I believe, was a magnet for many but how that was made “femifest” was a piece to the puzzle to yet unfold.
When it was time to listen and problem solve the many issues of controversy that arose it became clear very quickly we did not have a process that could be applied. And one of the essential reasons for this lack of process is we knew nothing of the old would serve us. As a result there was much resistance to old ways. But it was obvious we needed something to rise above the confusion.
Although difficult we had to accept a “Transitional Model” for our full process into the “I Am” lifestyle. The “Transitional Model” as I see it is an awareness that we are cultivating the “I Am” values while admittedly recognizing we are still uncovering what that truly means to live it, apply it to our daily experiences.
It is one thing to state love and light but another to live it. And according to the OPC perspective who is going to be the judge of that demonstration?! No one!!! So who is responsible for one’s actions? You are! So what happens when you experience another’s actions but the problem still persists? You face yourself and find the creative solution from within.
As you know this is where it gets tricky. The 3D paradigm has demonstrated a pattern of seeking all our answers from without. An example is you identify the problem on the outside and then you either manipulate the situation to satisfy your desired answer or in the instance of another person bee-ing the perceived problem the other person has to change. This is the all too familiar model of “you are the problem so you have to change”.
At this point, this continuing presentation and elaboration of the OPC perspective is all my own and in no way reflects any declaration or statement from the OPC core as their own unless they want to endorse these as shared truths. I am simply using “OPC” as the stimulus for these furthering thoughts and inner truths.
The OPC perspective, in my interpretation, goes down a whole variety of different paths when seeking “creative solutions”. The scenario, the way I see it, is a controversial issue comes to the attention of the “community” or “group” or between 2 individuals and an intention for a “creative solution” is sought. The OPC approach, at this moment in time, is to proceed while bee-ing in alignment with values such as, self reflection, responsibility, transparency, accountability, liability and cumulatively, the I Am, Eternal Essence.
When experiencing the conflict at hand and using these OPC guidelines the only place to seek answers, the way through, is by going within. One could begin this process by adopting a familiar “transitional” (and I say “transitional” because in our ever evolving selves these premises become no longer necessary) premise that everything and everyone is a mirror and serves the higher purpose of the “I Am”. In accepting this premise the inner dialogue may look something like this:
First, an identifiable trigger has occurred in yourself as a result of someone else’s actions. This trigger may elicit a set of reflex emotional responses such as blame, anger, fear, etc. But, of course, as a high spiritual bee-ing you desire not to demonstrate those emotions..lol.
When using the “mirror” premise the exploration and destination of finding the “creative solution” is only to go within.
Let’s say I note an emotional response within myself that is judgmental of another’s behavior. As I become aware of this emotion I feel the desire to blame the other and my expectation or misconstrued desire for a solution is that they change their behavior so that I am at peace. This is an old paradigm. The OPC perspective would be for me to note the inner response (self reflection) and then examine why I am bee-ing triggered (responsibility). As the grains of truth behind my response are revealed I then proceed to find peace with it. Usually I approach this part of the resolve by either using the ho-oponopono practice or any affirmative messages to myself of self love.
If I were to take this same scenario and now address the practice of transparency it may unfold like this. I identify the person I am bee-ing triggered by and ask if I may converse with them about my issue. I would know that engaging with this person on the trigger I am having is for me to gain clarity and release of my emotional response. Alongside this understanding I would also know that I am not expecting the other person to change their behavior so I feel better. In fact, I would know that the mere fact that I am bee-ing able to express myself to this person is the “creative solution”. Because in the end it is not an action I am looking for but a release. However, in the course of this exchange the other person may very well have their own grains of truth to offer to the conversation. Yet again that person isn’t expected to change or compromise themselves but there may be an empathy or self reflection on their part that adds to the resolve of the issue. What I have found is the mere expression, bee-ing heard offers a tremendous amount of release. It simply isn’t the details. Of course, this meeting is assuming the other individual is able to listen without getting defensive. And, of course, you are coming to them without an energy to attack but a full responsible energy of healing yourself through the release of expression.
In this practice what is revealed is a path of empowerment. The experience is that the “creative solution” always resides within yourself. This can be applied to just about any scenario of emotional triggering.
As a result of this revelation I have proposed that it be used in a variety of problem solving events. The issue is brought to the table. The individuals speak to their triggers not the outward details of the issue. Emotional release is gained through the attentive listening and the ability to speak your peace. Then allow some breathing space after these exchanges and watch how the creative solutions simply emerge. The sensitivity of those involved typically expands and the deeper desire to truly reach out from the heart resonance is more enhanced simply because you have been acknowledged and heard.
In my deepening of the OPC perspective absolutely everything turns inward. All the answers are there in the very unique stillness of my inner sanctum. There are times when we have to exercise discernment and make choices that are appropriate for our own individual peace. And these choices may appear to be tough love to others.
The concept and understanding of community from an OPC perspective is first and foremost be-earthed from the invisible, within. It does not come with any preconceived notions, guidelines or tangible definitions. However, the OPC perspective does have an inner prompt and gesture that may result in all the above. This is the task at hand, to allow the inner prompts to reveal the new paths of consciousness in form. There are no outer training tools to create the new understandings of “community”. It is all about inner reflection and emergence of one’s I Am that is called forth in these times. One may ask “what are the behaviors of an OP community”? The only behaviors that could possibly result from an OPC perspective are not the ones you “think” are appropriate but the ones that emerge as a result of your inner truths. There is no forethought in how to behave or structure any scenario. The heart resonance is the portal to these new understandings. The questions are not for just the mind to answer. In fact, it’s time for the mind to take a long vacation. It has been so over programmed with limitation that it barely can touch the heartful imaginings of this new day.
It is a new day and the portals are abundantly everywhere…simply “jump” and allow what is coming from the deep inner I Am, one eternal essence to emerge and guide the way.
In the concept of “community” there are many issues to be addressed. There are issues of accomplishing necessary tasks at hand, albeit, the basics such as food gathering, cleaning, etc. No one appreciates bee-ing told what and when to do a task. Thus, we are asked to rely upon each and every individual’s understanding of their part in the responsibility to the whole. But what happens when individuals don’t recognize their role in responsibility? What happens when no one takes the trash out? How are these matters dealt with? These very simple matters are often the crux for community contention. The usual scenario is that these basic mis-alignments often lead to separation. This is a very old and outdated resolution for in the end we are once again alone. And once again our heart seeks the connectedness that is truly reaching from within.
The OPC perspective does not offer the new paradigm unless everyone involved in the OP community understands and implements what it means to act from the “I Am”. I believe this discrepancy is what emerged as we arrived in Aouchtam, Morocco. What clearly presented itself was the remnants of the old paradigm versus the new one. As Einstein once said, you cannot create a new system from the logic that created the system of old.” This is the crossroad we are at and understandably so. This juncture is what I refer to as a need for a “Transitional Model”.
A “Transitional Model” for these times needs to address when we are operating, responding, problem solving from the dynamics of the old paradigm versus when we are operating, responding, problem solving from the new paradigm, I Am. This is no easy task but it is our destiny.
With this understanding or accepted premise of evolution we are met with the challenge of embracing the invisible, the unknown and an unfolding life that cannot be “thought” through. Our only avenue of peace is through our hearts. But what the heck does that look like?
Love and heart fullness are concepts. Just about everything we have called a system or guidelines are concepts. This is the playing field of the ego. And the ego loves the fact that as much as we think we can connect via community acceptance of concepts it is just an illusion. And the reason behind this illusion is we are each uniquely and brilliantly different from each other. So what’s the result of that? We have just as many perceptions and understandings of each and every concept as their are an each and every one of us. So where do we meet? Well, it appears the heart portal is about the only offering that is genuine and unique to each and every one of us. But what and how do we get past the concept of heartfull portal and become that portal. Aaaaah, now we are addressing the real issue. Let’s return to the definition of OPC perspective.
When our beautiful hosts of the One People Radio Shows came forth, along with the introduction of Heather Tucci-Jarraf, we were introduced or rather re-introduced to a vocabulary and language of our “I Am”, One Source, Eternal Essence. Documents were presented in what we referred to as a sort of “divine language” an “I Am” language. And as many of you know, especially those of you who chose to come to Aouchtam, this topic went viral. The 5D Media Network ( recently repurposed as The One Network) delved into the materials presented by Heather and thus opened an ongoing dialogue with the online community. In a very short amount of time the community took off running with a multitude of discussions and perspectives shared regarding the many aspects of this newly presented material.
I trust that many would agree that these topics were mind boggling yet attracting spiritually minded folks as well as people just simply done with the old paradigm. None-the-less, it attracted quite a field of interest, hope and imaginings. Somewhere along the way the focus transformed from the original OPPT documents to the more spiritually, practical life issues of consciousness. If you go back to the archived shows there is a distinct change in the community attendance and interests.
At this time the community delved into what I refer to as the OPC perspective. There were many who were trying to wrap their brains around the vocabulary that Heather introduced but the vocabulary was an invisible and energetic language. Yet, the mind veered its old paradigm head and continued to try to put this language into a box that they could recognize, dissect, formulate and memorize for present purpose and use. This language never stood up to this old paradigm inquiry. But our bold Radio Hosts continued to hold the torch and dared to go down this rabbit hole in the face of a very wide public audience. Now they had made themselves vulnerable, as all public figures do, to the rampant criticisms and projections of a confused world of illusion. Granted, they were as vulnerable to the praise as well but the criticism always seemed to stand out. A deer friend, writer of mine once said ” If you are going to accept the praise then you have to accept the criticism as well”. I believe this would be a sample of the middle path.
Anyway, the stage was set and the cast of characters began to make their appearance. A brilliant show was launched.
Let’s return to the OPC perspective. In a numerous amount of ways this perspective revealed its genuine gem of love-wisdom. We were clearly beginning to crossover with the multitude of spiritual teachers, gurus, philosophers that drove home the love-wisdom as originating from within, albeit, the One Source, Eternal Essence, I Am! In truth, we were now experiencing the many conversations that were addressing the same topic ” How do we “be” the I Am, what does living this life look like”? And finally, where we are now, what is community when living the life of I Am?!
There is nothing I Am going to share here that you haven’t heard already about journeying on a spiritual path. However, what I hope to reveal is perhaps some added insight to the practicalities of a community based upon the “I Am” from an OPC perspective.
There were some basic themes that were consistently presented during our online community experience. Those themes were Responsibility, Transparency, Accountability, Liability, Sovereignty, Value and I Am, One Source, Eternal Essence. Of late, these following themes have been added; 6 Heart Virtues by the Wingmakers, Understanding, Compassion, Forgiveness, Humility, Valor and Appreciation.
Responsibility is a multi-dimensional practice. There are no checklists on whether you are responsible or not. However, when an act of responsibility occurs you are likely to identify it. That is, if and only if, you identify responsibility in yourself. The OPC perspective of responsibility is foremost and solely responsibility to yourself and only yourself. The understanding and “deep frequency of trust” is that as you are responsible to yourself then it will emerge in an essence and maybe a behavior of responsibility for others to see. But that is not a requirement nor the place to look in doing your personal assessment. Only you know if you are bee-ing responsible. With that bee-ing said the perhaps unsaid parameter of an OP community would be that you get this understanding and you practice it. Thus, the “deep frequency of trust” is responsible action will be exhibited in all ways. Therefore, no confrontation or policing is a necessary imposition on anyone because you are self assessing along the way.
And, yes, this does imply a full commitment to your personal spiritual journey, self study or consciousness raising…however, you may define that relationship with your self, higher self.
At this moment, I’d like to say that the OPC perspective is not offering any of us a spiritual practice. There is plenty of writings and teachers available to choose from. OPC is a perspective on the outcome of one already having a practice. We are now addressing the results of the practice that you choose that would allow or enthuse the “I Am” to come forth. This is an important distinction.
Some of you may be asking what happens when due to a person’s spiritual growth they do not exhibit the responsible action that you think should occur around a particular issue. This is a very important question when it comes to conflict in a community environment. How and where does the “creative solution” emerge?
Now we introduce “Transparency”. In relationship to finding “creative solutions” transparency becomes a necessary tool. Transparency, once again, is not something outside ourselves. We are not the judge of whether someone is transparent or not. Transparency is your “responsible” action to uncovering your genuine emotions and potential reactions, responses to what does occur within and around you. What strengthens your ability to be this honest with yourself is how deep your personal spiritual practice is. The depth of which you sense and genuinely know who you are, your “I Am” is what determines your ability to be honest with yourself. The deepening and knowing of the “I Am” is the deepening and knowing of Self Love. Self Love is nurtured and cultivated by the One Source, Eternal Essence. And for this community of viewers I can say Self Love, I Am, is the “Core” of knowing you are “Over Unity”. Long Live The QE(E)G!!
Just experience these words and sensations for a moment…
In seeking a “creative solution” we now call in responsibility and transparency. When you recognize that you have a negative reaction or response to something or someone outside yourself it is signal to “pause” and self reflect on the origin of this response (responsibility). This is when you do your own soul searching on where did this experience emerge from and in this day and age what programming designed that response. You may have your own set of self questionings for this process. Use whatever helps you to uncover the genuine grain of truth underlying the response (transparency). Note, you are in full examination of self. This is not an examination of other and their behavior. It is your response that you are examining. Now I will say this is where a spiritual practice truly supports your efforts. A practice nurtures Self Love. Therefore, when you go down the rabbit hole you love yourself so much that you dare to risk the truth behind your responses (compassion). If you aren’t stable in this self truth, I Am, there will be the tendency to blame or avoid because you don’t love yourself enough to accept what is. This is a very crucial turning point in all spiritual practices. And this understanding I might add is one of the invisible parameters of OP perspective. Invisible because there is no rote behavior to mark off on a checklist that demonstrates that you got it. No, if you really got it, it will appear in all your actions as a result. The appearance will occur in a myriad of creative expression. So why put limitations on how it will look. Simply do the inner work and “allow” “I Am” to “Be”.
Getting back to “creative solution”…The old paradigm would have you think that the “creative solution” is out there somewhere, that some behavior has to be manipulated or changed to come to resolution or for you to feel better. That is a victim stance. The I Am “creative solution” comes from within the heartfull resonance. This is your stance of self empowerment. So how might this unfold in a conversation with someone who is a “trigger” for you. I propose this practice. First, you go to your inner sanctum and have an honest exploration of where your response is coming from (liability). You love and forgive yourself for the hard moments of reckoning. Then you ask to meet with the individual that you have the “trigger” with. From the beginning you already accept that this meeting is for your self growth and understanding. You do not hold any intention or expected outcome of the individual you are meeting with. That clearly means there is no expectation of them changing their behavior so you feel better. The intent is you know that in expressing yourself you will hopefully gain some insight and lighten your heart. You meet with the person and begin to explain I have a “trigger” and it is you I am having it with. Are you open to helping me to find a “creative solution”? Assuming they say, yes, you proceed. We’ll address that they say, no, later. The conversation begins with you self processing aloud with this individual. You are sharing that you have the feelings that you are having when they participate in a certain action. There is no blaming in this delivery of words. You are bee-ing empowered merely by the fact that you are expressing yourself and the other is attentively listening. Don’t underestimate the value and power of this interaction. Most likely the other will add their insight to the experience and may even dialogue with you on how to gain more clarity or perhaps a grain of truth they have to offer to your trigger experience. It is important to reiterate a few times in your presentation that you are not here to blame this person. This will in-courage the other person to be at ease and not on the defensive. You simply desire the opportunity to express yourself so you may gain more clarity and more importantly release the emotional “charge”. The “creative solution” is never an expected outcome however an outcome may occur. The “creative solution” is an emotional release of the “charge”. And the “creative solution” on a material realm is likely to occur after this charge is released. Because once an emotional “charge” is released the heart opens rather quickly. An open heart is a natural resonance of “creative solution”. Now the practice of “allowing” and witnessing the rewards of that interaction is the calling. This calls for patience, trust and inner eyes wide open.
An example with more detail might look like this. Say your trigger is the dirty dishes left in the sink. This frustrates you until finally you are holding a resentment. The resentment is now closing your heart to this other bee-ing. In fact, like all resentments it starts to grow and get more intense. You have already asked this person several times to clean up but it still happens. Or you just assume this is a spiritual person in your community and he/she should be responsible enough to know these are his/her dishes. Ahhhh, an all too familiar assumption. So you self reflect and maybe even self flagellate because you have judged yourself for bee-ing so trivial or think from some stupid dogma or belief that you as a spiritual bee-ing should be above that and where the h___ is my compassion and forgiveness anyway. Hah! LoL! Sound a wee bit close to home?! Hahahaha Anyway, you do self reflect and still no inner peace. You go to the other person. You share the resentment but get this part clearly, you are not expecting the other person to start cleaning their dishes. That’s not the point. You are seeking the release of your emotional “charge”. You want to understand why you are responding in that way. You know that airing this out with the person you have the “trigger” with is the healing release and restored heart resonance. Again, the other person may or may not do the dishes but the heartfull and transparent conversation will enhance an uplift in heart resonance. Now after all is said and released simply watch how the energetics change. Allow the nugget of the “creative solution” to reveal itself. This does require patience and trust that the upliftment is there. And there is a good probability that the dish washing may come into practice but don’t count on it.
In regards to other saying “no” or other getting defensive in your heartfull attempt to clear is a very difficult issue. There is no way through when a shared willingness and consciousness is not present. One of the greatest challenges of the OP perspective is the absence of pre-created concepts in form. The OP perspective, remember, is invisible. The form only results in the presence of “I Am”. The responsible “I Am” becomes apparent in action in the moment, each moment, one after another. Therefore, there is no pre-determined way of bee-ing. If we reflect on a non-sharing of consciousness of this OPC perspective there is truly nowhere to go in “density”. When this impasse presents itself it is only indicative of not choosing to embrace the OPC values of responsibility, transparency, etc. It is only indicative of where one is on their spiritual journey. It is only indicative that the “I Am” is barely present. Because there is no way bee-ing proposed on how one should behave there is only the invitation and in-couragement to bee present to what is. Therefore if one is saying “no” rather than the exploration of that reaction or response then they have made a choice to not bee transparent nor responsible. If the “no” cannot bee explored then there is no demonstration of liability, accountability, etc. At this juncture it seems that only acts of “tough love” are invited, that is in “density”. Or one can certainly continue to contribute to uplifted consciousness via the ho-oponopono practice.
This is where we return to the “transitional model”. Some of the parameters that were used in the old paradigm beg to be imposed in the transitional model. Those parameters are exercised as discernment and what may appear as “separative” or sometimes known as “tough love”. And what does this look like? In the example of community it would be that certain individuals will be cohesive together and choose to share a resonance and other individuals will either not be invited or asked to leave.
However, this is facilitated with great love and compassion. As you can imagine and probably are feeling in this moment this is a very tough call and yet still necessary.
How does “I Am” resonate with such a decision. The “I Am” is full responsibility for one’s self. If an environment or bee-ing is exhibiting a diminished environment or spewing a negativity it is the “I Am” that seeks the resonant vibration that suits its higher self best. One may choose to remove themselves or one may be self empowered and simply state the parameters they are choosing to cultivate or bee nourished in. This is a freedom each and every one of us can exercise while simultaneously having compassion and understanding for those that they do not resonate with at that moment.
This particular issue is often confused with an old paradigm model of what has been called “love”. There are 2 kinds of “love” the way I see it. There is the old paradigm understanding of love that barks at the concept of discernment that would say certain individuals are not included in a particular resonant group for whatever reasons. According to old paradigms and dogmas of religion and spiritual practices we are led to believe we “should” love everyone. And so the permeating koan of any kind of separation is frowned upon. Not only is it discouraged but a tremendous amount of guilt has been built into this form of love. Guilt even to the extent that a victim will continue to stay partnered with their abusive spouse because they “should” be able to love them enough to heal them. Days later victim is unconscious from a blow in the head because the underlying belief discouraged the discerning choice to depart from a negative or diminished environment. I know this was a rather severe example but I think I conveyed my point.
The other definition of “love” comes from within and is the premise for understanding that all existence is energy and all energy is love. This energetic understanding is where the expression of “we are all one” comes from. The I Am, One Source, Eternal Essence is love. This is where we are all love and connected, Oneness.
Why did I bring this up? Because the old paradigm of “love” is an obstacle to our freedom and self empowerment. It’s a program that is no longer serving us. Discernment and choosing parameters that cultivate and nourish our energetic nature is necessary for our spiritual well bee-ingness. It is our sovereign, “I Am” rite to exercise choices that enhance our “I Am” presence. This is an empowerment tool I suggest that we reclaim. Walk away from energetics that feel negative and that create diminished environments. There is no spiritual call, responsibility or liability to heal these programs. It is our responsibility to heal our own vibrations and trust that this is how we are changing the world.
This article clearly continues as I observe the ongoing consciousness that surrounds me. But, for now, I will call this closure and invite you to look for ongoing articles.
I love each and every one of you!
Blue Star Deerwomon